-
Case 5
Question: which responsible authoraccepts a situation where Reviewer 1 isnot giving any constructive feedbackfor the second time,and Reviewer 2 is providing feedback on acompletley different manuscript ? “It’s a mistake of the system and can be ignored.”That is very responsible.
-
Case 4
Networking and collaboration in the era of no-Email and no-Telephone. I have to create a new Email for every person that I don’t know personally and wants to discuss/collaborate with me. This makes networking so much more difficult, makes people around me (justifiably) afraid, which only reinforces the narrative of the perpetrator. But I still…
-
Case 3
Passive-aggressive behaviour, denial/delayed collaboration and feedback when you report inappropriate messages.
-
Case 2
Code must be checked in private office?
-
Case 1
What happens when you don’t deny a Scientific Committee (SC) membership. What happens when you eventually deny a Scientific Committee (SC) membership – Bad characterizations and mansplaining– Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender (DARVO)– Negging
